The DC vs Marvel Movie Conundrum

DCsuperherocollageYou may have noticed that there are a lot of superhero movies being made these days. There are probably lots of cultural and societal reasons for that, but that’s a discussion for another time. What I want to talk about is that, while there may be a lot of superhero movies being produced right now, there are even more complaints about those superhero movies.

Oh, the complaints aren’t that the movies are too childish, too fantastical, too removed from the real problems of the world–no, no, none of that. The complaints are that DC can’t seem to get its act together to make a decent movie based on one of its iconic characters. Well, except for Batman. They’ve done quite well with Batman, though that last movie was a little confuddled. The Superman movie got exposed to too much kryptonite, Wonder Woman is somewhere lost in time and space, and the Justice League is stuck in the clubhouse for the foreseeable future.

Meanwhile, the other Big Comic Name, Marvel, has been rolling out great superhero movies one after the other. Spider-man (I, II, and III, plus a reboot with The Amazing Spider-man), Iron Man (I and II), Thor, Captain America, and, of course, last summer’s superpower-level blockbuster, The Avengers.

So, why can Marvel manage it, but DC falls out of the sky?

You can make (and read about) all sorts of arguments: poor management, poor directors, poor scripts, blah blah blah. However, those arguments all miss the biggest bane of DC’s superhero properties. I said it up in the second paragraph: “iconic characters.”

The DC Big Three–Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman–are staples of American culture. They are so entrenched in the American psyche that even people who have no interest in comics, in superheros, or even in escapism, know who these characters are and probably even something about their backgrounds. And all this, mind you, even before the characters entered the mainstream through TV shows and movies. Before the movies, you could very likely go out to any Midwestern farm, track down a farmer on his tractor, ask him who Superman was, and he could tell you. Same for Batman, and the same–although he might have been more loathe to admit it–for Wonder Woman.

But Iron Man? Who the heck is Iron Man? Some comic book dude made out of iron or something, right? Thor? Never heard of him. Captain America? Maybe. Spider-man? Okay, sure, he probably heard of Spider-man. I’m not saying this line of reasoning is perfect. However, Spider-man was always second tier to the Big Three: Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. You probably wouldn’t find Peter Parker having coffee with Clark Kent, even though they’re in the same business–both in and out of costume.

What Marvel was able to do by taking lesser known characters and putting them up on the big screen, was to introduce them to the movie-going public in a fresh way. I read a lot of comic books as a kid, but Iron Man? He seemed boring. But Marvel took the character and made him bigger than he’d ever been in the comics. So big, in fact, that now Iron Man is one of their own iconic properties. So big that if a Marvel movie doesn’t have a Robert Downey Jr (the actor playing the part) cameo in it, then it’s failed on some substantial level.

True, DC succeeded with the Batman franchise. In a way, though, this is because Batman is a lot like the second-tier superheroes of the Marvel universe: he’s fallible. He’s human. He’s just like us, only with more money. We in the audience know that we can’t ever be Superman or Wonder Woman. Those characters were born to their parts, but if we won the lottery, then maybe, just maybe, we could be Batman.

So the other reason that most of the superheroes–at least the ones doing well at the box office–from the Marvel universe are doing well, is that the majority of them are just regular people who have been given extraordinary powers, be that from a spider bite, from the exploitation of high tech, or from super science.

Sure, there’s Thor, but he gets away with it because he’s one of those lesser-known characters I was talking about.

Anyway, given all of this, what can DC hope to do to change their fortunes? It seems obvious: they’ve got to get away from focusing on the Big Three and focus, instead, on their second-tier characters: Flash, the Martian Manhunter, Plastic Man, and, er…Green Lantern.

Okay, maybe it is poor management, bad directing, and terrible writing after all.

If you’d like to see a superclip of every superhero movie ever made, check this out: http://blastr.com/2012/04/epic-supercut-swarms-with.php That’s also where the author found the pic at the top of the page.

Posted in Reviews and Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Words to Action (The Genesis of Lady Starr, Space Ranger)

The Lady Starr, Space Ranger cast performing.

The “Lady Starr, Space Ranger” cast performing Episode #1: “Lady Starr and the Tentacle Monsters of Venus!”.

As an essayist and novelist, most of the words I write on the page stay there, nice and safe and able to be interpreted by me how I meant for them to be interpreted (i.e.: how they sounded in my head when I wrote them down). Other people may read them and interpret them differently, but I won’t know that unless they say something in the comments section. No, they are … safe.

But recently, what started as a side-project of mine — the “Lady Starr, Space Ranger” audio play series — has been teaching me about the dynamism of words.

“Lady Starr” is about an aspiring actress and former Miss Kansas from, erm, Kansas who goes to Hollywood to break into movies, but winds up in the Space Ranger Corp instead, protecting the galaxy from evil and stuff. Okay, that makes it sound all heartwarming and life-affirming. It isn’t. It’s a spoof of those old, pulpy, science-fiction radio plays of the 1930s, 40s and 50s — the Flash Gordons, the Buck Rogers, the Shadows, and so on (such as this 1935 production of Flash Gordon). Lady Starr likes her job, but she isn’t particularly good at it — unless there’s zapping or sword fighting. She’s good at that, but not so good at diplomacy or making meetings on time. And her crew is just as misfitish. There’s her exasperated sidekick, the genetically-modified, cybernetically-upgraded, intelligence-enhanced mollusk (read: snail), Vermicelli. And there’s the mopey, self-conscious, and soul-searching Speaker Phone, propagator of all things exposition-y.

Plus a lot of bad guys — many of whom have tentacles.

I started writing the series for a friend of mine who wanted something to fill some time on a radio program she was involved with. That fell through, mostly because the Lady Starr episodes I wrote were too long and — as far as I could tell — didn’t have enough references to bodily functions.

But in a fluke of serendipity (hmmm, if it’s “serendipity”, can it be a fluke? Discuss), I happened to mention the project to a local producer who also happened to be staging a series of dramatic readings (and humorous re-invention and improvisation) of the original Star Trek series. He was primed for interest in an original retro-pulp story like Starr’s AND he’d just been approached by a radio station to provide some programming.

So I started working on more scripts and he started working on all the other stuff: getting actors, liasoning with the radio station, and so on and so forth and so such and such.

George Cron works behind-the-scenes on the production of "The Adventures of Lady Starr"

Our producer, George Cron, working behind-the-scenes on an episode of “The Adventures of Lady Starr, Space Ranger.”

To glaze over this next part, well, that didn’t work out. The deal with the radio station fell through and our first recording was lost to the aether. I was out of the country at the time and hadn’t been able to make it to the first recording sessions, but had been told they’d gone quite well.

There we were. But I had the “pilot” season finished, writing-wise (five, 20-ish minute-long episodes), so we decided to just record the thing ourselves and put it out there and see what happened.

Plagues of technical difficulties followed, along with losing some of the original voice actors due to, y’know, life. But we persevered, despite having to completely re-tape the first episode no fewer than three times and having to do all of this with the most basic of gear and studio space (a couple of mics, a computer, and a back bedroom in the producer’s house).

But I got to be a part of that, since I had returned from my trip by then. And that’s where we get to the oddity of hearing your words come out of other people’s mouths, interpreted sometimes in ways that you the writer might never have expected.

I sit in on the recording sessions as head writer, of course, making changes on the fly to the script as needed (and depending on how tongue-twistingly I wrote some of the original dialogue) and serving as informal behind-the-scenes videographer and still photographer.

But sooo strange. Inflections, pitches, intonations — all were subtly or vastly different than those of the voices in my head (which I should probably take something for, but don’t. Heh).

The voice actors were pulling the words off the page and making them into something else, something new, and something (hopefully) compelling to our (hopefully) vast, future audience.

Here’s a sample. These two characters, Bob and Phil, were originally throw-away characters used to pitch products in one of the show’s fake advertisement bits. But when I was writing, they just kept pushing their way back into the script. Here, Bob and Phil are scientists on Titan working on sentient pizza toppings and trying to sell their product to a pizza-loving galaxy. Keep in mind, too, that this isn’t how the final audio will sound; it’s behind-the-scenes, after all. Enjoy:

Not what I’d heard in my head, which wasn’t quite as over-the-top. This was better.

“The Adventures of Lady Starr, Space Ranger” is a shoestring production, so help us out by following us on Facebook (Lady Starr, Space Ranger) and Twitter @SpaceRangerHQ  and, when post-production is done and the season is up on iTunes, have a listen, and enjoy the action of the words taking you to a place far away and very silly.

Posted in Creativity, How To | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Plugs for the Month of June

The flyer for my solo June show at Gailey's

The flyer for my solo show at Gailey’s in June.

Hi there, goblinos and goblinas. It’s the first day of June and thus is time for me to plug some of my ongoing projects. First of all, if you’re in the Springfield, MO area tonight, stop by Gailey’s Cafe (220 E Walnut Street) and chat with me over wine and snacks while browsing my photography show there. I’m calling the set of nineteen shots “Street Seen” and it’s mostly images taken on the spur-of-the-moment in and around Springfield, Missouri. There’s also a few shots from Eureka Springs, Arkansas, and even a couple that I snuck in from elsewhere in the world.

While you’re in the neighborhood, I’ve also got smaller sets at Canvas Art Gallery (315 South Ave), and a slightly larger collection at Q Enotecta Wine Bar (308 W Commercial St) showing with some of artist Angela Forrest’s paintings.

If you’re not in Missouri this month (those will all be showing in those locations throughout the month of June), then stop by my photography website on the webernettubes at http://cpatrickstudios.zenfolio.com.

Then there’s the “daily” (ha!) webcomic at http://www.goblinbrook.com. and, of course, this blog. You can also follow me on Twitter @Parablehead and on Facebook as C. Patrick Neagle.

Other projects this month include editing my archive of essays and making them available as e-books. I’ve also got a few novels that need the same treatment or need to be sent out to agents — whichever I feel like at the time.

It’s going to be a busy month here at Goblinbrook Manor. Give me some encouragement in the comments section below. Cheers!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment