In Defense of Television

The speculative fiction author Harlan Ellison referred to television as the “glass teat” in his book of essays of the same name. The implication, of course, was that television is a pacifier of sorts and that in sitting mindlessly in front of it and allowing it to feed images and often inane commentary into our heads, we are often kept from doing anything substantial with our lives.

There are lots of internet pages (like this one) dedicated to the idea that television is evil and keeps us, as a society, sedated and thereby keeps us from marching in the streets and demanding whatever it is we happen to want to demand of our governments–local, federal, feudal, or the just and righteous governance of our robot overlords.

Well, maybe not that last one. Yet.

There have been claims that television is bad for children, making it hard for them to distinguish between reality and fiction. There have been claims that increasingly violent programming on television increases the level of violence in our society. There have been claims that television is a giant lizard created by atom bomb testing and is coming to eat our cities and burn us all with radioactive flame.

Okay, maybe there hasn’t been that giant lizard claim. Yet.

Don't judge me

It's waiting. Waiting. Waiting.

But is television really all that bad?

Back in the 1990s, I was a television addict. There was a time when I would come home from taking or teaching a class and plop down on the comfy couch with a soda and some chips and just flick through channels, watching three minutes here, one minute there, killing time by means of the remote until the top or bottom of the hour came, whereupon I’d continue flicking through channels, hoping that now that the programs had changed there would be something worth watching.

Next thing I knew, it’d be three hours later and if you had asked me what I had been watching I could honestly have said, “Nothing, nothing at all.”

Except dreck.

I eventually overcame my addiction by moving to Mexico, where we didn’t have a television for several months and when we finally did get one, it only got one channel that had any programming in English and would spontaneously turn itself off and remain in self-imposed isolation for days on end. True story.

Television’s evil, for me, as an addict, was that it was a time suck. As a writer and a photographer, I ought to spend a great deal of my time, y’know, writing and taking pictures. It’s hard to write or take pictures when you’re watching television. It’s also hard to have conversations with your friends, go hiking, do science (“Science!”), meet new people, be a contributor to your community, or hunt for proof of the existence of the chupacabra.

Wily, wily chupacabra.

But guess what? None of that was the television’s fault. It was the programmers’ faults for not putting on entertaining, educational programming. It was the writers’ faults for not creating thoughtful, witty, complex stories that could then be programmed. Most importantly, it was my fault because I forgot the Golden Rule — no, not that we should do unto others as we would have them do unto us (or even “Do unto others before they do unto you”), but rather “All things in moderation.”

Too much food–high cholesterol and blood pressure.

Too much partying–bad health, no sleep, and meeting guys named Bubba in the lockup.

Too much television — the almost certainty that you’ll accidentally watch an episode of “The Jersey Shore” and be scarred for life.

Now that I’m back living in the States, I watch television on a regular basis again. But I’ve found that my tolerance for the dreck has decreased considerably and I’ve found that, lo-and-behold, moderation is a good thing. I no longer just flip through channels for hours at a time hoping that something good will be on. Instead, I use my television to watch shows that I know I want to watch (usually, with the help of el DVR, whenever I want to watch them)–the ones that are well-written, witty, insightful, and/or mindless escapism (yes, escapism is okay, too, in–you guessed it–moderation). I use my television to watch movies. In these days of technological wonders, I also use my television to watch independent programming from the internet, play video games, and learn what my Wii age is on Wii Sports (28, if you were wondering).

The television, like all tools, is what we make of it and what we make with it. A hammer can crush your thumb, or help you build a birdhouse. A pipe wrench can help you get that diamond ring out of the drain, or be the weapon of choice in Clue. A television can make you the mental equivalent of a Caesar side salad, or it can open your mind to a sweeping world of creativity and challenging thought.

Your choice.

Now, excuse me, please, I’m going to go watch some…no, you know what? I think instead that I’m going to go see if I can hunt down a chupacabra.

Wily, wily chupacabra.

[There have been times when the author has almost been eaten by his television and not just chupacabras. It’s a very large television, after all. If your television is showing signs of sentient evil, you may contact the author for advice in the comments section below or via his twitter feed @parablehead]

Posted in Observation Deck | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Stake to the Heart of Vampire Romance

Um, I thought you said you were 18.

Ah, love. (photo: Creative Commons)

Since the latest “Twilight” movie either just came out, is coming out this week, or will be coming out pretty soon (I can’t keep up with the release dates on this; it’s like trying wrestle with greased pigs), we are provided an opportunity to examine one of the great issues of our time.

No, it isn’t whether you should be Team Edward or Team Jacob. I think that’s been decided.

And, no, it isn’t…

Hold on. ‘What’s “Twilight,”?’ you ask. You know, that paranormal movie franchise with the angsty teens, the werewolves that can’t keep their shirts on, and the vampires that glow–some might even say ‘sparkle’–in the sunlight?

That one.

It’s also the franchise (both book and movie) that lots and lots of people, myself included, like to make fun of, mostly because we don’t think that vampires should sparkle. At worst, vampires should only sparkle a little bit when exposed to sunlight, and that only right before exploding into vampire goo a la the remake of 1985’s “Fright Night”, or 1987’s “Lost Boys”, or the “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” TV series, or, well, every other piece of vampire fiction and lore ever published in a book or onscreen or whispered while huddled around a campfire.

Really, how are we supposed to prepare for the inevitable vampirepocalypse if we’re given inaccurate information?

But I don’t want to get into the sparkly thing right now, mostly because there are lots and lots of people who really like the “Twilight” series and I don’t want them mad at me. No, there’s a much more important issue being developed in the vampire genre as a whole than whether or not vampires should or should not look like 1970s-era disco balls. This issue goes right back to Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel, “Dracula,” wherein his four-hundred-plus-year-old vampire, Count Dracula (not to be confused with the cereal spokes-vampire of nearly the same name) woos (sort of) young Lucy and young Mina.

That’s right, “Dracula,” rather than being a morality tale about ultimate evil, is a tale of the ultimate May-December romance, even though nobody in the story seems to notice this part, focusing instead on how best to administer stake-to-heart CPR.

This is because what would, in any other circumstances, be considered culturally dubious misbehavior, if not morally and ethically wrong (depending on whether the girl-in-question’s father has a shotgun or not), is, in vampire fiction, completely overlooked because the vampire is good-looking. Let’s take a look at the standard set-up, what you will see if you refer to any given plot of any seven out of ten vampire novels/movies/tv shows out there right now:

Girl is in high school. She’s pretty. Angsty.

Girl meets mysterious stranger. He’s pale. Has sharp teeth. Broods a lot.

Girl falls for mysterious stranger because, well, he’s very handsome. Knows a lot of stuff, like languages and history, but not math. Plus, he broods.

Girl finds out that mysterious stranger (let’s call him Ed) is actually a vampire, but he’s alright, doesn’t eat people–or tries not to anyway, which is the same thing–and falls for him even more because…um…well, I’m unclear on this part, but probably something about all that experience. Oh, and his sense of humor. Wait, no, that’s not it. Gotta remember the ‘brooding’ part. Can’t brood AND have a sense of humor. Just doesn’t work.

Sorry, back to the point. After that, there’s some conflicts and stuff, mostly dilemmas that keep threatening the eternal love that the Angsty Girl has with the Brooding Vampire Ed. In the end, though, they surmount the odds and love happily ever after, which for vampires is a very long time, barring stake-to-heart CPR, in which case there’s the Eternal Love in the Afterlife option, which has the advantage of allowing the audience to brood and by angsty.

What’s the problem, right? Let’s take a closer look at some of the Girls and Vampires involved in these stories:

“Twilight”: Girl: 17, Vampire Love Interest: 105.

“Buffy the Vampire Slayer”: Girl: 15, Vampire Love Interest: 262ish

“Dracula”: Lucy: 19, Mina: er, a year or two older, Vampire Love Interest: 400+

“True Blood”: Girl: 25, Vampire Love Interest #1: 173, Vampire Love Interest #2: 1000+

“The Vampire Diaries”: Girl: 18, Vampire Love Interest: 164

Of course, a possible sub-text here is that the old adage that age doesn’t matter in relationships is correct–well, except in the case of the lovers in “Twilight” and “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” where, in most states, this type of relationship is referred to by another old adage: statutory rape.

What comes across more strongly, however, is that, unlike yet another old adage, it isn’t how old you feel that’s important, it’s how old other people think you look.

If you look like you’re seventeen, even if you’re 105, then it’s apparently okay to hang around high schools and hit on the underage girls, because I’m betting that if you actually looked like you were 105–or, heck, thirty–doing the same thing would get you put on a few sexual offender watch lists.

Even in those other cases–the ones that wouldn’t end with criminal indictments–I’m betting that the line “But, Sookie, I feel like I’m in my twenties” would not go very far toward convincing said 25-year-old that you were datable material if you looked like you were 173 (or 1000, in the case of Vampire Love Interest #2). Nope, you’d better also have a lot of disposable income, be Hugh Hefner, or both.

The vice versa of this is also true. Yup, if love really is about how you feel inside, and the outside doesn’t matter, then shouldn’t most vampires, no matter what they look like, be pursuing romance in a nursing home somewhere? Because those long-lived folk have a lot more in common with said vampire than the high schooler does.

At least the conversations would be less likely to turn on whether or not you were Team Edward or Team Jacob.

[The author doesn’t have anything against our vampire overlords. In fact, if there are any vampires out there who would like to make him an immortal creature of the night, they can contact him in the Comments section, below. Follow him @Parablehead on Twitter]

Posted in Observation Deck, Reviews and Rants | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Appendix of Halloween (October Horror #6)

Spppoooookkkky!

Happy Halloween!

Anyway, at last it’s Halloween. You’re at the video store, or scrolling through your Netflix Instant Play list, or trolling Hulu looking for something thematic and atmospheric. You’ve been reading my columns on the subject, but, to be honest, you’ve forgotten most of the movies I mentioned as being good ones, or couldn’t really decide if the author (that’d be me) liked them or hated them because he’s a really bad reviewer. And you think to yourself: “So what horror movies should I watch?”

Here are my recommendations. If you’re wanting to dip into the movies that will keep scaring, year after year, viewing after viewing, then pop these into the Blu-Ray player. Call ’em the Canon of C, in no particular order, with twitter-worthy commentary and plenty of spoilerage:

Classics:

“Halloween” (1978): When you never know if it’ll be a yowling cat or Michael Myers behind that door.

“Friday the 13th” (1980): When you never know if it’ll be a yowling Kevin Bacon or Jason Voorhees behind that door. Oh, and axes to the head.

“Nightmare on Elm Street” (1984): A murder that takes place on the ceiling. Committed by an invisible force. With lots of blood. Then, later, a very creepy body bag. Ohhh yeaaah.

“The Fog” (1980): When your ghostly leper pirates can cause a tape recorder to catch on fire just because a piece of their wrecked ship happens to be nearby, you know you’ve got some serious ghostly baddies.

“The Shining” (1980): Twin girl ghosts and a Big Wheel. Shudder.

“Carrie” (1976): Last scene. Nightmares for years afterward. Enough said.

“The Omen” (1976): Priest skewered by a lightning rod. Classic.

“The Exorcist” (1973): Priest drenched with pea soup vomit. Classic.

“Candyman” (1992): This one was filmed in the very real projects with very real danger. Dunno whether the actors knew that before they signed their liability waivers.

“Amityville Horror” (1979): Creepiest flies in any movie, any time.

“Blair Witch Project” (1999): Despite the snotty nose shot shown on the DVD cover and in every promo made, this slow burn Found Footage pic gave me an honest-to-goodness nightmare as an adult. Gotta love that.

“The Ring” (2002): The beginning of the English-language versions of Japanese ghost women who crawl around in a very disturbing fashion and who have nearly sentient hair.

“Alien” (1979): Space. Difficult to hear screaming. Also, beware who you have lunch with.

Teen Scream:

“Scream” (1996): The movie that revitalized the horror movie in the 1990s. Gotta give it credit for that. It was also a clever, self-referential masterpiece of writing. Now, of course, it’s been imitated so much that you’d never know it was once fresh.

“Jeepers Creepers” (2001): Pretty sure the Creeper drives the same truck as can be seen in “Halloween: H2O”. Also, he’s creepy.

“Saw” (2004): The sequels got old very fast, but the original was, well, original. Smarter than I expected and not as bloody as one might think it’d be for something called “Saw.”

“I Know What You Did Last Summer” (1997): Fun slayings of silly yutes. Who can complain?

“The Faculty” (1998): Pretty teens fighting an alien tentacle menace. Scarier than you might think. Also, a pretty good soundtrack.

“Final Destination” (2000): It’s never quite the final destination after all, but the first one has a nice angle.

And, for when you want a break from the mind-numbing horror of it all, or at least want a few laughs interspersed with your screams:

“Ghostbusters” (1984): Source of more movie quotes (“Don’t cross the streams!” than anything other than “Aliens” (“Game over, man! Game over!”)

“Shaun of the Dead” (2004): Grab a bag of popcorn and a box of vinyl records and watch this movie for the first time or the hundredth. It’s worth every record thrown at a zombie head.

“Zombieland” (2009): Join the quest for the world’s last Twinkie(tm). You want some rolick with your zombie hunting? Here ya go.

“American Werewolf in London” (1981): The humor here is woven expertly with the horror so that you’re never quite sure which is coming next .

“Idle Hands” (1999) Seth Green in the moralistic tale of what happens when you’re a slacker and live in your parents’ basement for too long.

“Scary Movie 2” (2001): The “Ring” parody is actually scarier than the same scenes in “The Ring”, but also funny. Very, very funny.

“Dead Snow” (2009): Not much overt comedy, but, um, it’s zombie Nazis in the snow. That’s frackin’ funny.

And…

“Tremors” (1990): Kevin Bacon. Giant worms. Not that scary, but loads of fun.

There you go. If you can find half a dozen movies to watch on All Hallow’s Eve out of that bunch, then, well, I’ve done all I can for you and you need to move on to the Rom Coms.

Happy Halloween, everyone!

Posted in October Horror Thread, Reviews and Rants, Themed Threads | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment